(TwitterDialogue cut/paste: @BlueBoy38897848 @ArthurNeuform @Kalermon1 @elonmusk @lexfridman @joerogan September 9 – 11, 2020)
🙋♂️= Me (ie, ArtNeufor😉Mind💥💥)
🙋♂️: Dear Lexie&Joe: I’ve heard ur chat re cellular automata as metaphorical simplification (hopefully) of the ease of universe as simulation co-creation: if CA parameters (no matter how complex) r standard/finite, can *infinite unpredictability/novelity* occur over infinite time 1/2
If not, TheOmniversalMind would be nec bored2death, &have no impetus to Co-Create the Wonderment Humanity encounters each new day: phps? CA conditions model PhysiologicalMind, but not DiscursiveMind, & tf, not Consciousness: theQ?of InfiniteNOVELTY is crucial 2ur argumentation, L
👕I understand no computational program such as cellular automata as universal simulation could be sustained over all possible universes/possible time as infinite WellBeing given the nec boredom preclusion for WB-LIFE: ANY such CAprog/Time reliant conceptualization is highly Q?🤔
🙋♂️: 🚀Ur Thoughts, @elonmusk 🤔 (9 Sept 20)
🙋♂️: L argument holds for a hypothetical universe, so all universes, as reflections of the OmniversalMind: infinitely differing parameters could be ‘set’ by EmodiedConsciousBeings, eg Humans, as in the cosmological constant argumentation of String/MultipleWorldTheorists: CA relies 1/2
on parameters indistinguishable from cosmological constant argmts: so yes, CA as *metaphor*is reasonably illustrative of poss. engineering mech. but entirely deficient as explanation 4Lived WellBeingReality*Experience*:ie, nec MINUS mech. boredom’s predictability/non-novelty 2/2
Philosophiology position would not exclude CA as illustration, nor cosmological constants as the same: the Omniverse has always existed, or never: simply that… WellBeing MUST be fresh to negate boredom: therefore TheCompositionPrinciple predicts universe Co-Creation to …1/2
…nec transcend automation of any sort as boredom preclusion to WellBeing: *Actively* Composing OPTIMAL/Novel WB within superset of CApara as metaphor is reasonable: CAComposedConsciousBeings compose Omniversal”CA” as VALUE/WBChoices, thinking novel/opt UniversesOfSelf to exist 2/2
As metaphor, CApara engineering illustrations r useful: but as ORGANISMIC UniverseOfWellBeingSelf, as opt/novel (non-bored but fitting in with OmniversalWellBeingEcology) CA *automation* erroneously negates Co-Creative compositional activity as acts of WellBeing: as opt/novelty. So L’s illustratively correct, as r all CA models of Self: in sum, WellBeing as central co-creative generative mechanism cannot be reduced to CA, as Co-Creation is central to WB: CA cannot be co-creative, as automata r nec -WB: words do not tell love stories; lovers do(👌🏻)😉🧢🥀.
Next day 🚀ELON MUSK @elonmusk selects this string of Tweets in response to 🙋♂️My request for 🚀His input:
@DisruptResearch (24 Apr 19): Tesla’s R&D productivity is completely insane. It is out of this world. 1/5 $TSLA @elonmusk @Tesla
In late 2016, Tesla severed ties with Mobileye and had to rebuild the vision stack from scratch. Just 2 years later, Tesla’s solution is vastly better than Mobileye. Intel then acquired Mobileye for $15B. 2/5
Tesla’s new full self-driving chip also vastly outperforms NVDA’s. This too was achieved in just a few years, starting with close to zero in-house chip design capabilities. NVDA’s market cap is $116B and automotive is a big part of their story. 3/5
Tesla only spent $1.5B in R&D last year. It covered autonomy SW & HW, Model Y, Semi, Roadster, Pickup, Solar roof, mfg automation, cell/powertrain research, Supercharger v3, and Tesla Energy. Other automakers spent $7-10B each. 4/5
GAAP accounting treatment of R&D is just plain wrong for a company like Tesla. This is the most productive use of capital the world has ever seen. It is the fundamental reason why Tesla will continue to win. 5/5 @elonmusk $TSLA
🚀REAL ELON MUSK: @elonmusk 10 Sept 20: Tesla is best understood as a collection of about a dozen startups, mostly in series, increasingly in parallel. Every product line & new production system was invented. Instead of playing chess with the same pieces as everyone else, create new pieces.
🙋♂️: In short, 🚀Elon, cellular automata metaphors of simulation co-creation wouldn’t fit this form☝🏻above, of which 🚀U speak so highly☝🏻😉…😋yum… 🧢I mean, this is WellBeing/Enjoyment/Pleasure/Joy, etc💥💥👌🏻😘… same old moves&pieces =🥱sleepy-time😴: yet as 🚀U describe…1/2
…🚀U’ve co-created a new set of CA, thru🚀Ur intelligent design from first principles, based on Physics CA: by enjoying🚀Ur co-creative journey with🚀Ur Tesla co-creative buddies, 🚀U’ve co-created improved WBing for motor vehicle process: both old&neuforms=opt/novelWBing…2/2
So tf, 🧢BlueBoy, both (CA)&(notCA) obtain as WellBeingRealityCo-Creation, &potentially for Eternity (the embodied infinite Self as WellBeing) ie (👌🏻)😉: another Beautiful Paradox🌹co-created as Omniversal “CA”😆😉🙃 to co-create CAs: @lexfridman may have 🧸His uses after all😉🌟
Tho if CAs don’t conform to automata configurations, if they are disrupted, or misconfigure thru error, then novelty will necessarily ensue: perhaps this is part of CA Co-Creation as UniverseOfSelf🤔: can there be errors in CA simulation mechanism(?) … In living ecosystems 1/2
…this would nec be the case: errors perhaps part of Omniversal “CA”, tho only holds as mechanistic metaphor, not in actuality/LIFE: the CA metaphor extended thru ObservedReality🌏⚡⭐☄etc conforms to math-modeling projection as CA, tho not Organismic Universal opt/novelty. 2/2
Importantly, tho ‘errors’ per se beg the question of CA, faultlessly operating as flawless machine… 👕I don’t see that anywhere on Earth(?): 🦍HS cancer, 4 arms, 3 legs&12 toes: random genetic scrambling as evolutionary advantage tho still delivers mech-abstractionCA: ergo 1/2
😊Omniversal”CA” must nec incl opt/nov WBing(👌🏻)😉as central 😊”CA” mech. for all poss. CAs to transcend/track thru ‘error’:😊”CA” MUST tf be all CAs ID-Form; ie TRUTH:ArtNeufor😊Mind💥💥 is this TRUTH:tf all possible CA Universes r modelled off 😊”CA” TRUTH thru opt/novelty💥2/2
MoralBeing tf has a clear direction:that dir. is the CA of HUM🌟NITY:🦍HS as with all 😊”CA” CAs, approximates 😊”CA”, but is NEC ‘erroneous’ in its tracking trajectory towards 😊”CA” as H🌟Y &=NEC opt/nov co-creation CA, approximating 😊”CA” so CCting HUM🌟NITY as CA for 😊”CA”.
Tf, MIND = 😊”CA”
& CA= DiscursiveMind ÷ PhysiologicalMind:
or CONSCIOUSNESS =
Discourse ÷ Physiology:
ie Philosophiology: artneuformind.com 💥💥.
🙏🏻, @lexfridman🧸…Cellular Automata are
useful Philosophiology Heuristic🧢😉
BeWell&Happy(👌🏻)😉:
It’sSuch&So😊
@elonmusk
The End
??CELLULAR AUTOMATA 🍃ADDENDUM 🤔
🙋♂️Perhaps CA=DiscursiveMind × PhysiologicalMind wrt Cellular Automata in particular ie 🧢My intuitive thinking processes sumtimes skip steps, or synthesize… the × not ÷ feels right🤔… so CA here can be a sub-theorem that refers to CA=DM×PM, where CA is Physiology in primary 1/2
theorem ieCONSCIOUSNESS(MIND)= Discourse(Mind)÷Physiology(Mind). NBly, cellular automata r*CO-Created*by Mind as Physiology:CA r autonomous by Nature(Priapus(👍🏻)inConceptionFamily), but DiscursiveMind positions their ArtNeuform💥Nature 4 WellBeingReason as NEC NOVEL *CCtd* Mind 2/2
⚔I see… good point: by multiplying DiscursiveMind × PhysiologicalMind, the autonomous Nature of automatic mind is amplified as Priapus(👍🏻) contributes to simulation as Physiology; ie L🧸 focus as an engineer is nb relevance here: its REAL ENGINEERING, kinda 🚀E style🧢😉…1/2
CA theory&appl. is useful contrib. to Philosophiology: CA usefully apply Co-Crtn of PhysiologicalMind as ArtNeufor🌟Mind💥💥: CAmultiply&configure predictable automatic Physiologies thru which ECBings express WellBeingRealityMind as ArtNeuform💥, hence their numerator position2/2
🙋♂️Tho We (🙏🏻)🥰 could simplify for illustration purposes-as illustrative heuristic-an equivalence in the CA investigation&the Philosophiology primary equation ie,CA=DiscursiveMind ÷ PhysiologicalMind as is written in the article above: :perhaps beginning of refinements…🤔
End of Addendum